Skip to main content

Interviewers: Getting the Right Person on the Bus.

Here are a few thoughts about hiring.  Having been on both sides of the hiring table over the last five years, I have gathered up the following:  

I think everyone would agree that the goal of interviewing people is to find the right person.  Any business owner will say that their people are key to their business.   Unfortunately, everyone is in too much of a hurry.  The interviewee wants to get to work quickly and the interviewer wants to get done with hiring so they can get back to work.    This fact, combined with the current structure of the human resources selection and interview process is NOT to find the right person, but to find the one person that can check the greatest number of boxes on the job description and that will work for the lowest salary. We use degrees, accreditations, licenses, certifications, and this intangible thing we call "experience" to try and find the right fit.  Is this really the best way?

Most hiring managers are not very good at getting great people and HR's only function is to pare down the list of applicants for the hiring manager.  Typically the hiring manager takes the list from HR and tries to figure out who to hire, but based on what?  Resume quality?  If the job includes resume writing, then this might be a good method.  Because hiring is not their strength, most hiring managers give up and simply hire the person suggested by someone in the company.  They figure that is safer than dealing with an unknown quantity.

Almost every task (outside of professional technical skills) can be trained.  Which would be better?  (1) To find a great person, invest a couple of weeks into training them on the specific systems you use, or (2) to find the person who knows your system, but is not a good fit for your organization.  Dumb question, easy answer.

What if there were a minimum of 3 interviews?

  1. Screening interview. (1 hour)  Sit down with HR and make sure you are not a wacko and that you have the skills and experience needed (on paper).  
  2. Technical/skills interview. (2 Hours) Demonstrate you are qualified to do the work.  
  3. Are you the right person? (4 Hours) Have the person write, create, collaborate, take a personality test.  Have them do strength finders 2.0.  Spend the time to really find out if they a a good fit for your team.   When they are done pay them $100 for their time.  
If appropriate, ask for a portfolio of past work.  Check their on-line presence.  What are they saying and what type of people are following them?  Remember people typically do what they are passionate about on the weekends.  That is also what they post about on social media.  

Maybe it is time we starting think out of the box when it comes to hiring. 

I would suggest everyone read this article called How to Get a Job at Google

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bajio, Cafe Rio, or Costa Vida?

It is time for the showdown.  Which one is best: Bajio, Cafe Rio, or Costa Vida?  Or is it (as was my opinion) that they are all exactly the same?

I decided to do a taste test.  Six people participated.  Three were salad testers and three were burrito testers.  None of the people who participated have any food judging experience although a couple of them have competed in cooking contests and have a couple of first place finishes to their name.   Each couple went to a different restaurant and picked up a Sweet Pork Salad and an Steak Burrito to go.  We ordered each salad with black beans and their creamy green dressing (whatever they happened to call it).  The steak burritos were ordered enchilada style with black beans. Then we all met at a central location and judged each dish on the following:


Value Score = Weight (oz)/Cost($)
Overall Appeal (visual appeal, aroma, garnish)
Recipe (Cooking, ingredient combination, too moist or dry)
Taste (Flavor combination, Seasoning, Texture)




This …

Using Tags in the Gospel Library App

A few weeks ago I wrote a post about using the highlight feature in the gospel library app to differentiate between gospel topics.

Why do we highlight in the first place?  The answer is simple.  It comes from the day when most people used paper scriptures.  They used colors and highlights to help you find scriptures.  Most of us do not have the time or the capacity to memorize the references for hundreds of scriptures so we relied on the our memory to get us close.  For example, the scripture about the natural man being an enemy to God, in my mind is not in Mosiah 3:19, but it is located in the first few chapters of Mosiah on the right hand page in the right column toward the top.  So, to find it I would simply flip through the first few chapters of the Book of Mosiah until I locate the highlights that I made on Mosiah 3:19.   This system served me well until we all started using electronic scriptures.  Now there are no pages or columns.  It is just one long column separated into chap…

No, I am not a vegan

Why I'm not a vegan (or a vegetarian for that matter).  After my previous post about the Word of Wisdom, I felt I should write an additional post covering this topic. 
First, the word "vegetarian" means nothing.  There are so many levels, tangents, and offshoots of vegetarianism that applying the label to yourself or anyone only causes confusion.   Some vegetarians eat dairy, some don't.  Some eat fish, some don't.  Some eat eggs, some don't.  Some are weekday vegetarians, and some only honor meatless Monday.  And the list goes on and on.  Labeling yourself as a vegetarian is simply a label that brings on a confusing discussion.  So, I don't use it.  
I'm not a vegan either.  You see, vegans typically fall into three categories: - They are in it for their own good health - They are doing it to be kind to animals, promote animal rights, avoid animal cruelty, etc.  - They are doing it do save the planet
The trouble with many vegans is that they tend to become…